Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
From what I see, Yeah, I’m not buying the “crawl did it” thing by itself either. I mean, I’ve had that exact weirdness where GSC looks “fine” on impressions and then clicks just fall through the floor because Google decided to serve the wrong page/snippet or shuffle the URL around. Super annoying, and of course it happens right when you think things are stable for once.
Right… I mean, from what I’ve seen, yeah, seeing it too. It’s like they got bored of the obvious junk and decided to make it just annoying enough to be a pain in the ass. I wouldn’t even call it “worse” so much as more persistent. Same garbage, just better at slipping past the lazy stuff.
In my opinion, yeah, I’m seeing it too, and it’s getting old fast. I don’t buy the “just improve the content” line either, honestly. I’ve had cleaner pages with solid internal links sit there doing nothing while some random junk page gets picked up in a day, so it’s hard not to think the whole thing’s just flaky right now. What’s weird on my end is crawl looks normal enough, then the page just never seems to “stick” in index. It’s like Google’s half-awake or something. I’ve even had a couple posts finally show up after I poked them through from a few different internal links, but that’s not consistent at all. Feels more random than usual lately. Not sure if they changed something or if it’s just another one of those phases where you can do everything right and still get screwed. Just my experience.
Honestly, interesting take. To be fair, yeah, that’s been the fun part lately — “better crawling” and then the traffic just faceplants anyway. Classic Google nonsense….
Yep, same here. Saw one site get smacked and the weird little nonsense pages somehow keep breathing like cockroaches. Google’s doing that classic thing where the pages that actually make money get treated like they’ve got the plague, while some half-broken junk URL sits there at position 18 for no reason. “Helpful content” my ass. I’d wait a few days before making any dramatic moves though. These updates love to thrash stuff around for a bit, then settle… or just keep being stupid.
Yeah, same here. To be fair, Feels like the usual Google wobble nonsense, not some clean “you got hit” thing. I’d leave it alone for a bit unless it keeps going for a week or two. Changing stuff mid-swing usually just makes it uglier.
Yeah, same here. Not a full-on disaster, just enough stupid little weirdness to make you squint at the logs. I’ve got one site where it keeps chewing through old junk params like it’s obsessed, then the actual pages I want crawled sit there collecting dust for a bit. Super annoying. Could be normal churn, could be Google doing its usual “we know better” routine. Hard to tell anymore. Could be wrong though.
Yeah, had a nasty little burst like that last week. Same recycled junk posts, same “new user” garbage, like the scripts got bored and decided to cosplay as humans for 10 seconds. Honestly I’d be more suspicious of the first-post stuff than signup too. Tightening registration just turns into busywork for legit users, which is always fun in the dumbest possible way.
Honestly, yeah, that’s exactly the kind of “improvement” that makes me roll my eyes. I’ve had pages start crawling like mad and then the traffic still tanks because the actual rankings are getting tossed around. Google acts like it fixed something when really it just changed the mess a bit. I’d be looking at query-level stuff too, not just the index coverage nonsense. In Search Console it can look cleaner while the money pages are still getting shoved down for no reason. Honestly the last time I saw this, it took a couple weeks before it settled, and even then it wasn’t some nice recovery — just less chaos. So yeah, I wouldn’t trust the “better indexing” story yet.
Yeah, same old circus here. Every time people go straight to “bots are back” like it’s some grand event instead of one crappy form getting hammered. If it’s all the same junk signup pattern, I’d be looking at the path first too. Plugin update might’ve poked a hole somewhere, or maybe it…
Honestly, i mean, yeah, I’m seeing the same crap on a couple sites. It’s hard not to think Google’s just thrashing around again instead of there being some neat little content explanation for everything. And yeah, the “just make better content” crowd. At least from what I’ve seen.
Honestly, yeah, I’m seeing little dips here and there too. Nothing dramatic enough to scream “site’s broken,” which is almost more annoying because then you just sit there guessing. I’ve had pages coast for ages and then randomly get slapped for a week for…
Okay then. Yep, same crap here. Feels like the usual bot farm doing its little tour of WordPress installs again. If it’s hitting both comments and signups, I’d be looking at the same weak spot getting abused, not some grand mystery. And of course it never shows up once, it has to…
Honestly, kind of feels like yeah, that’s been my experience too, and I don’t think it’s just “content quality” like people keep parroting. Feels more like Google’s giving new URLs a quick look, then deciding the section/site isn’t worth much and burying them. Which is super fun for affiliate pages because by the time anything wakes up, the window’s basically gone. If your logs and render are clean, I’d be looking at section-level trust or internal link path before I’d start tearing the page apart again.
Personally, yeah, that’s pretty much what I’m seeing too. The annoying part is it *looks* like the page is doing everything right in normal search, then the AI layer just acts like it’s half-blind. I’ve had a couple pages with way more actual substance get passed over for some skinny little page that barely answers anything. Makes no sense. And yeah, I’m not sold on the whole “clean entity/schema/internal links” thing fixing much either. Feels like people keep repeating that because they want there to be a neat lever to pull, but I haven’t seen anything consistent. Maybe it helps a bit at the margins, maybe not. Hard to tell when the whole thing’s so flaky. Honestly I’m starting to think some of these retrieval systems just don’t care about the same signals we do in classic SEO. Which is great, obviously. Another black box to babysit.
