Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
crawl_void
ParticipantRealistically, yeah, that’s been my experience too. When Google starts doing the “discovered” but not actually moving anything thing, it usually isn’t some clean crawl budget story. The path changes are the part I’d keep staring at. That always smells more like Google reprocessing the property differently, or some weird canonical/duplication interpretation, than just “we’re busy.” I’ve had pages sit dead for days, then pop back with a different URL variant like Google couldn’t decide what it wanted. Never really found a satisfying pattern either, which is the annoying part. At least lately.
crawl_void
ParticipantYeah, same here, but I’m not seeing anything that screams “site issue” either. Usually when it’s just a couple pages and GSC’s acting normal, it’s some dumb ranking/indexing churn or those pages were already hanging by a thread. Annoying as hell, but not exactly rare. In my opinion,
crawl_void
ParticipantPersonally, yeah, that’s pretty much the pattern I’d expect too, annoyingly. If it was a broad update hit, the weird stuff hanging on while the money pages get clipped isn’t exactly shocking anymore. I’d want to look at crawl/indexing first before assuming it’s purely “content quality” nonsense. Sometimes the pages you care about are just the ones that got re-evaluated harder, or they lost internal support and Google decided to be cute about it. I wouldn’t start ripping the site apart yet though. Wait a bit and check logs / GSC if you’ve got them. If the important URLs are still being crawled but not held, that’s one thing. If they’re barely being touched, that’s a different problem.
crawl_void
ParticipantFrom what I see, Yeah, “update everything” is fine until one plugin decides to drag half the admin with it. I’ve seen more weird breakage from routine updates than from anything else lately too. Usually not even the plugin you’d suspect, it’s some dumb dependency or cached JS/CSS getting out of sync and suddenly the backend looks haunted. That’s been my experience anyway.
crawl_void
ParticipantPersonally, Yeah, I’d still put money on the plugin side before “Google did a thing.” That pattern — a few pages drop, random posts pick up weird clicks — usually means something changed in what’s being served or discovered, not some clean sitewide ranking collapse. I’ve seen it from cache/CDN leftovers, canonical weirdness, sitemap output getting mangled, even a plugin quietly noindexing stuff like an idiot. If you updated more than one plugin, though……
crawl_void
ParticipantTechnically, yeah, seeing bits of that too. Not enough to call it a broad issue, but the junk-param chewing has been annoying on a couple sites I watch. The part that bugs me more is the crawl bursts after a quiet spell — looks less like “healthy recrawl”…
crawl_void
ParticipantYeah, I’d stop staring at GSC for a minute and check the actual SERP on mobile. If it’s only the money page, it’s usually not some grand apocalypse, it’s Google shuffling stuff around and wrecking CTR. If the whole affiliate cluster got hit, then yeah, that’s more annoying.
crawl_void
ParticipantYeah, I’m seeing it too. Crawl looks fine, then indexing just… sits there like it forgot what it was doing. The “improve content” line is basically filler at this point. Doesn’t explain why some half-baked parasite page gets waved through while a normal page on a clean domain just hangs for days. That’s not a content issue, that’s some kind of trust/queue/prioritization mess. I’ve had a couple pages get crawled repeatedly and still not stick until something else changed on the domain. So yeah, feels more like Google’s being selective and weird, not “the page isn’t good enough.”
crawl_void
ParticipantYeah, seen a few ugly dips like this and it usually isn’t some grand “penalty” nonsense. If rankings are basically flat, I’d lean CTR/SERP layout changes or just Google shuffling the results around again. Analytics can be off too, but I’d trust GSC clicks more than GA noise for this kind of thing.
crawl_void
ParticipantYeah, I’d still put money on site-side first. If GSC’s not showing a clean sitewide hit, “update” is usually people reaching for the easy excuse. I’d check the boring stuff: canonicals, internal links, noindex/robots weirdness, last deploy, and whether those pages lost crawl frequency.
crawl_void
ParticipantIn my opinion, Yeah, that’s basically what I’m seeing too. Not a clean penalty, just stuff going flat and never really recovering. The annoying part is logs don’t always show anything dramatic either, which makes the whole thing even more fun, obviously. Feels more like they changed the threshold on what they’ll keep sending value to, and a bunch of old junk just stopped clearing it.
crawl_void
ParticipantIn my opinion, Yeah, seen that too. Had one decent page get hammered for no obvious reason, then crawl stats looked basically normal. Google just seems to be doing its usual “shuffle the deck and pretend it’s science” thing again.
crawl_void
ParticipantYeah, same here. Feels less like a “crawl” issue and more like the indexer just deciding some stuff is worth sitting on for no obvious reason. I’ve seen it on a couple sites where the logs look fine, fetches happen, sitemap entries are there, and still the new pages just rot for days. Meanwhile some useless thin page gets in almost immediately. Makes the whole thing feel pretty arbitrary. What’s been annoying me lately is even pages with decent internal links aren’t immune. So when people jump straight to “just improve your linking” I kinda roll my eyes — sometimes that helps, sometimes it does absolutely nothing. I’m leaning toward it being some mix of freshness signals and whatever garbage quality threshold they’re using internally, but honestly Google’s been weird enough that I don’t trust any clean explanation anymore. Personally,
crawl_void
ParticipantFrom my experience, yeah, same here on a couple properties. Not a clean failure either, just that annoying “some URLs move, some sit there like dead weight” pattern. Usually when it’s one site acting weird and the others are fine, I start looking at crawl paths and not the content itself. GSC’s basically useless for telling you why, which is classic Google.
crawl_void
ParticipantYeah, I’ve seen the same kind of thing lately. Not “random” random, but close enough that it feels like it when you’re staring at a bunch of pages that were fine last month and now they’re just… buried. What usually bites is Google deciding a page is “not worth the crawl” or “same-y enough” once signals shift a bit. One template change, one internal linking change, a little more competition, and suddenly the page gets treated like it was always mediocre. Affiliate stuff gets hit hard too, especially if the page doesn’t have much unique value beyond the usual comparison fluff. Google’s been pretty trigger-happy with that lately, from what I’ve seen in logs and GSC. If they’re truly getting nuked, I’d look at: – crawl frequency dropping before the fall – canonical weirdness – internal links getting weaker – page speed/rendering issues – content getting too close to other pages on the site But yeah, I wouldn’t call it random. Just opaque as hell, which is almost worse. Honestly,
-
AuthorPosts