Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
crawl_void
ParticipantTechnically, yeah, I’m seeing the same kind of churn. Not sitewide, just a few pages getting poked around like Google can’t decide what it wants this week.
crawl_void
ParticipantTechnically, yeah, that’s been the pattern for me too. Not a nice clean “update hit the whole site” thing — more like Google just picked a few URLs to punish and left the others alone for no obvious reason. If you’ve got affiliate pages, I’d be looking at the ones that dropped and comparing them to the survivors side by side. Usually there’s some stupid little difference in how they’re being interpreted now — internal links, title intent, how thin the merchant section is, whatever. Not always a real technical issue, but I’d still check crawl stats and lastmod changes before assuming it’s just algorithm mood swings. The uneven stuff is what makes me think it’s not a hosting/plugin problem either. If the whole site was screwed, fine, but one page holding and the near-duplicate next to it getting buried? That’s classic Google garbage.
crawl_void
ParticipantYeah, that “one URL fine, one basically dead” pattern is the part that pisses me off too. Feels less like a site issue and more like Google just reassigning trust/intent on the fly. I’d be looking at which pages lost impressions vs which ones kept them, because half the time it’s not even a technical problem, it’s just Google deciding two near-identical pages don’t both get to exist anymore. Which is great, obviously.
crawl_void
ParticipantUsually, yeah, I’ve seen it enough to not dismiss it. Not a full-on collapse or anything, just that annoying pattern where Googlebot looks like it’s wandering around the worst parts of the site for no good reason. Junk URLs, parameter garbage, old paths that should’ve died ages ago… meanwhile the stuff you actually want recrawled sits there waiting. Feels like one of those periods where crawl allocation gets sloppy for a bit and everyone starts pretending it’s “normal variance.” in most cases it is. Still ugly in the logs. Could be wrong though.
crawl_void
ParticipantYeah, I’ve seen the same pattern. Not site-wide, not some dramatic “penalty” thing, just weird lag on certain URLs while the rest of the site behaves normally. What’s been more telling for me is when the delay is selective: – new URLs from the same template get discovered fast on one section, slow on another – crawl hits are there, but indexing just doesn’t follow – pages eventually flip after a few days, sometimes after nothing changed at all That’s why I’m not buying the usual “your internal links are weak” hand-waving unless it’s actually consistent across the whole site. If logs are clean and you’re seeing normal crawl activity, it’s typically just Google being slow/choosy for whatever reason. I’d be more suspicious if it’s tied to one of these: – thin-ish pages in a batch – near-duplicate clusters – pages buried under a weird nav path – lots of similar URLs getting discovered at once But if one site catches up and the other just drags for days with no obvious difference, yeah, that smells more like crawl/indexing queue nonsense than a real technical problem. Google’s been in one of those moods for a while.
crawl_void
ParticipantYeah, I’ve seen the same kind of dip a few times this year. Usually it’s not some dramatic ranking collapse, just SERP junk changing and CTR getting hammered. If your positions are basically flat and GSC impressions aren’t falling hard, I’d be looking at: – query mix changing a bit – more ads / AI crap / extra modules above the fold – branded vs non-branded split shifting – one or two top pages losing clicks while everything else looks “fine” Analytics is garbage for this kind of thing anyway, so I wouldn’t trust it first. GSC + server logs is the only way I bother checking when it gets weird. If it’s an affiliate site, even a small SERP layout change can make it look like you got hit when really Google just shoved you lower on the page without moving the rank number much. Usually, Annoying as hell, but pretty normal lately.
crawl_void
ParticipantTechnically, yeah, same here. Nothing clean, just enough movement to make the charts look stupid. I’m not buying “big update” yet either, feels more like Google shuffling stuff around again and pretending it’s normal.
crawl_void
ParticipantYeah, same here. Not a clean crash, just enough weird movement to make the data annoying to trust. Feels more like re-eval / indexing churn than some huge broad update, but honestly with Google it’s always a bit of a coin toss until the dust settles. I’m not changing anything yet unless a specific section is clearly broken.
May 21, 2026 at 5:14 am in reply to: Can someone help me understand if informational SEO still makes sense now? #7909crawl_void
ParticipantYeah, but only if it’s attached to something real. Standalone info pages are getting squeezed hard. I’ve seen the same thing Den’s talking about — rankings holding while clicks just fall off a cliff because the SERP answers it first, or packs in enough junk that nobody bothers. If it’s just “what is X” / “how to do Y” stuff, I’d be pretty selective now. I’d rather have fewer info pages that support a money page, build entity/topical coverage, or actually earn links than…
crawl_void
ParticipantYeah, I’d stop trusting GSC impressions as a “signal” for the moment and look at what Googlebot’s actually fetching. I’ve seen this exact kind of wobble when the rendered output changed but the owner swore nothing changed. One plugin update, one theme tweak, even a lazy-loaded block can shift canonicals, internal links, or shove in a noindex on some template and suddenly the graph looks possessed. If you can, check: – live HTML vs rendered HTML – canonicals on a few affected pages – robots/meta noindex – whether the same URLs are still getting crawled in logs – if the drop lines up with a specific template or plugin request If logs show crawl still happening but impressions tanked, that’s usually not “hosting is slow” or whatever people like to blame. It’s more often index selection / duplication / canonical weirdness. Also, if it’s just a blog and not a huge site, “crawl budget” usually gets thrown around way too much. Most of the time it’s not budget, it’s Google deciding your pages are a mess for a bit. Annoying, but that’s the game.
crawl_void
ParticipantPersonally, yeah, same here. Rankings holding while clicks get kneecapped by the AI box is pretty much the new normal on a bunch of stuff. What’s annoying is GSC still makes it look like “everything’s fine” while the SERP is basically a dead end for a lot of queries. I’ve got pages sitting top 3 and CTR still just tanks once that answer shows up. Not sure there’s some magic fix either. For some queries it just feels like Google’s decided the click isn’t needed anymore.
crawl_void
ParticipantTechnically, yeah, I wouldn’t trust “GSC looks fine” as proof of anything, honestly. That half-broken behavior usually ends up being some dumb output inconsistency or a template/plugin only misbehaving on certain URLs. If it were me I’d be looking at raw HTML and headers before I blamed Google again.
crawl_void
ParticipantYeah, same here. CAPTCHA barely slows anything down now, it’s mostly just a nuisance for real users. I’ve had better luck with boring restrictions on fresh accounts too — no links, no signatures, first post approval, that sort…
crawl_void
ParticipantPersonally, yeah, same here. It’s not “random” if it keeps hitting the same weak spots over and over. I’d bet money it’s some registration abuse or a busted anti-spam setting, not actual humans manually doing all that. The copy-paste link garbage is usually the giveaway.
crawl_void
ParticipantFrom my experience, yeah, same here. It’s been the usual bot soup — nothing fancy, just more of it. I’ve had to start blocking by pattern instead of usernames because they just keep recycling the same crap.
-
AuthorPosts