- This topic has 18 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 16 minutes ago by
.
-
Posts
-
-
Anyone else seeing this crap lately? I put up a batch of new pages on an old affiliate site, nothing fancy, and traffic just started bleeding out like clockwork. No manual action, no obvious tech issue, nothing in GSC screaming at me. Just a slow ugly drop. What’s annoying is the old junk pages are still hanging around and the new stuff barely moves. Feels like Google is just ignoring half the site for no reason. I’ve seen this kind of mess before, but this one’s a bit weird. I’m half tempted to nuke a bunch of pages and let it breathe for a bit, but that’s usually a gamble too. Anybody else had a site go sideways right after adding more content? From what I see,
-
Yeah, happens all the time when you bloat an old site with a bunch of new junk. Google starts acting weird like it’s trying to “re-evaluate” the whole thing instead of just indexing the new pages. If the new stuff is thin or samey, I’d honestly expect a bleed. Not magic, just the site getting diluted. I’ve seen it on affiliate sites plenty. Honestly,
-
-
Yeah, I’d be looking at the new batch first. If they’re all kinda samey, thin, or targeting long-tail stuff that overlaps the old pages, I’ve seen that weird “site gets heavier and everything drifts” thing happen. Not always a penalty or anything dramatic, just Google seeming to lose confidence for a bit. I wouldn’t nuke them all at once though. That’s usually how people make it worse and then spend 2 weeks guessing why. Maybe trim the worst ones, watch crawl/indexing, and see if the bleed settles. If you want, post roughly how many pages you added and what kind of site it is. That usually tells the story pretty quick.
-
Yeah, I’ve seen it. Usually isn’t “new pages = penalty,” it’s more like the site gets diluted and Google starts wobbling on what matters. If the new batch is samey or overlaps old stuff, that’s the first thing I’d suspect. I wouldn’t nuke everything blind though — I’d check which of the new pages are actually getting crawled/indexed and which ones are just sitting there doing nothing.
-
-
Personally, In most cases, yeah, I’ve seen that. Usually means the site’s getting diluted by the new batch and Google starts acting weird for a bit. If the pages are thin or overlapping, that’s probably the ugly part. I wouldn’t nuke everything yet though — that’s how people make it worse for no reason.
-
-
I mean, yeah, I’ve had that happen too, and it’s usually such a dumb little mess to untangle. If the new pages are kinda same-y, I’d be side-eyeing those first. I’ve seen old sites get weirdly “blunted” after a batch of weaker pages goes live, like Google just stops caring as much about the whole thing for a bit. I wouldn’t nuke them all at once though. That’s the kind of move that sounds satisfying and then somehow makes the site even uglier for a week or two.
-
In my opinion, yeah, I’ve seen that too. Usually it’s not some mystical “Google hates new pages” thing, it’s more like the site gets a bit muddy and the weaker stuff drags the whole thing down. If the new pages are overlapping old ones or just not getting any crawl/impressions, I’d be looking there first. Nuking a bunch of pages can work sometimes, but it can also just make the site look even more half-dead for a while.
-
-
Realistically, yeah, I’ve seen that happen more than once. Usually it’s not the new pages by themselves so much as they expose that the site was already kind of on the edge. If the batch was even a little same-y, I’d be suspicious of that before anything else. Google seems to get weirdly stingy once you add a bunch of “meh” pages all at once.
-
Yeah, I’ve seen that a few times. Usually it’s not the new pages alone, it’s the site getting a bit bloated and Google starts acting picky. If the old pages were already kinda weak, adding more same-ish stuff can make the whole thing wobble. I wouldn’t nuke anything yet unless the new batch is obviously junk.
-
-
-
Yeah, I’ve had that happen and it’s usually **not** some mystical “Google hates the site now” thing, even though it sure feels like it. In my experience it’s often the new pages being too close to the old stuff, or the whole site just looking more bloated than it did before. I’d be real careful with nuking pages though — I’ve done that once and it just made the drop harder to read, like you said Kind of feels like. If it were me I’d leave it alone for a bit and watch which pages actually got hit. Google’s been weird as hell with old affiliate sites lately anyway. Could be wrong though.
-
Yeah, I’ve seen that weird “add a batch, then everything gets a bit off” thing before. Usually for me it wasn’t the new pages alone, it was the site getting nudged into some uglier bucket in Google’s eyes — more thin-ish pages, more overlap, whatever. Not saying that’s definitely it here, but I’d be looking at the new set first instead of just blaming the whole site. And yeah, nuking pages is one of those moves that feels productive right up until it makes the data even messier. Been there.
-
-
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.