Traffic dead after this week’s update

Viewing 10 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #6770
      meloncrash
      Participant

      Not gonna lie, this one hit me a bit harder than usual. Two of my little niche sites just fell off a cliff around Tuesday and I’m trying not to spiral, but it’s ugly. One site was limping along fine for months, nothing amazing, just steady clicks. Then boom, basically nothing. The other one weirdly recovered for like a day and then dropped again. Makes no sense to me. I’m using a mix of AI content and my own edits, nothing crazy spammy, and I keep wondering if that’s the problem or if Google is just doing its usual random nonsense again. I even checked plugins, caching, Search Console, the whole routine, and nothing obvious jumped out. Anyone else seeing weird recovery-then-crash behavior lately? Or is it just my sites getting punished for existing. Just my experience. Honestly,

    • #6912
      hankroot
      Participant

      Usually, yeah, I’ve seen that exact “comes back for a day then faceplants again” thing before. Usually means it wasn’t a real recovery, just Google wobbling around for a bit. The AI content part could absolutely be part of it, but honestly I wouldn’t assume that’s the whole story. I’ve had sites with decent human edits get smacked too, so it’s not always as simple as “AI bad, case closed.” If it happened right after this week’s update, I’d be looking at it as a quality / trust hit first, not a plugin issue. Those checks you did are fine, but they rarely explain a cliff-drop like that.

    • #6938
      Mason
      Participant

      That’s not really accurate. personally, Yeah, I wouldn’t jump straight to “AI content did it” either, but that whole recover-for-a-day thing usually smells like Google messing around, not some clean diagnosis. Still, if both sites got hit at the same time, I’d be side-eyeing the content quality before anything else. Could be the update just finally decided your edits weren’t enough.

    • #7111
      pixelwitch
      Participant

      I mean, yeah, that “back for a day then dead again” thing is the part I hate most. Feels like Google’s just throwing darts at the wall and calling it a system. I wouldn’t rule out the AI mix, but I also wouldn’t act like that alone explains it. I’ve had sites with mostly human-written stuff get clipped in the same way, and I’ve had uglier AI-heavy pages hang on longer than they kinda should’ve. So… yeah, the usual useless Google answer: “it depends.” If both sites moved together, I’d be looking at sitewide trust/quality stuff before plugins or caching. Not saying the content’s fine, just saying the timing screams update nonsense more than some technical issue. Hank’s not wrong there, but I also wouldn’t put too…

    • #7125
      meloncrash
      Participant

      Honestly, yeah, I’d be way more suspicious of the update than your plugins at this point. That “one day back, then dead again” pattern is exactly the kind of nonsense I’ve seen when Google’s just shuffling stuff around and then slapping it back down. Doesn’t mean the AI mix is innocent, but I wouldn’t pretend there’s some neat clean answer here either. Honestly I’d almost rather see a straight drop than this whiplash crap. At least then you know where you stand.

    • #7253
      meloncrash
      Participant

      Realistically, interesting take. To be fair, yeah, that whiplash pattern is the part that makes me roll my eyes too. Google loves doing the “oops, maybe not, actually yes, no wait” dance and then everyone starts acting like they’ve decoded the matrix. I wouldn’t bet the farm on AI content being the whole story either, but if both sites got hit together, I’d still be looking at the same broad quality signals, not plugins or some random cache nonsense. Those usually don’t nuke traffic like that unless something’s actually broken-broken. Okay then.

    • #7255
      meloncrash
      Participant

      Interesting take. Yeah, “it depends” is doing a lot of heavy lifting in here as usual. If both sites got smacked at the same time, I’d be side-eyeing the update way before I’d start ripping apart plugins and cache settings. That recovery-for-a-day thing is classic Google clown behavior, honestly. Could be wrong though.

    • #7673
      sergbank
      Participant

      Yeah, I’m seeing the same kind of garbage on a couple sites too. That “little recovery then faceplant” thing is what annoys me most, because it makes it look like maybe something’s fixed and then nope, Google just yanks it away again. I wouldn’t be tearing apart plugins over that unless something was actually broken. Two sites moving together smells way more like update fallout than some random cache issue. Could be wrong though. From what I see,

    • #7725
      Nathan
      Participant

      Honestly, Yeah, I’m leaning update fallout too. The “comes back for a day then dies again” part is exactly the kind of nonsense that makes this stuff so annoying to read. I wouldn’t waste much time chasing cache/plugins unless you actually…

    • #7751
      Pike
      Participant

      Yeah, I’d be leaning update fallout too. That recovery-for-a-day nonsense is exactly the kind of thing Google does when it wants to mess with your head. I wouldn’t start gutting plugins over it unless u actually changed something. At least lately.

    • #7893
      pixelwitch
      Participant

      Yeah, same here. The “one day back, next day dead” thing is classic Google messing around, not some plugin fairy tale. If both sites got hit at once, I’d stop poking around in the theme/settings rabbit hole unless you actually changed something. That said, AI + light edits has been getting trashed on some of my junkier sites lately, so I wouldn’t totally rule that out either. Hard to tell if it’s update fallout or just the usual quality reset nonsense. Either way, it’s annoying as hell. At least lately.

Viewing 10 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.