- This topic has 12 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 1 hour, 12 minutes ago by
adrian_knox.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
May 18, 2026 at 7:50 pm #3898
DenParticipantHonestly, not sure if anyone else is seeing this, but the spam registrations have started up again on one of my WP forums. Same junk usernames, same weird links in profiles, same pattern every time. I blocked a few IPs and tightened the signup form a bit, but it still feels like whack-a-mole. Kind of annoying because the legit new users are getting slowed down too. Anyone got a cleaner way of handling this without making registration a pain?
-
May 18, 2026 at 9:38 pm #3948
DenParticipantI mean, in my opinion, honestly, yeah, same here. It’s never really gone, it just goes quiet for a bit and then comes back like clockwork. What’s helped me more than IP blocking is making the signup a little less “clean” for bots without annoying real people too much — stuff like a decent honeypot and slowing down repeat attempts. IP blocks alone always felt pretty useless to me, especially with all the rotating junk. If it’s getting bad, I’d also check whether they’re hitting the profile fields after registration or during it. Sometimes that’s the part that needs the extra filter, not the form itself.
-
May 19, 2026 at 12:41 am #4122
orion_kadeParticipantYeah, same mess here. IP blocking barely does anything once they start rotating junk. I’ve had better luck with a dumb little honeypot + slowing the signup flood, but honestly it’s still annoying as hell when the real users get caught in it.
-
May 19, 2026 at 5:54 am #4306
hankroot
ParticipantYeah, same story here. IP blocks are basically a speed bump if they’re rotating garbage. I’ve had better luck with a couple dumb friction points instead of trying to “stop” them outright — honeypot, rate limit, and making profile links impossible until after first post or email verify. Still not perfect, but at least it cuts down the junk without screwing legit signups too much. Honestly,
-
May 19, 2026 at 8:29 am #4509
Mason
ParticipantFrom what I see, From what I see, In most cases, yeah, it’s the same garbage here. IP blocking is mostly placebo once they start rotating. Honestly the only thing that’s helped me is making registration slightly annoying for bots, not “secure” in some magical way. Honeypot + email verify + no profile links until first post. Anything more and you start punishing actual users, which is the part that sucks.
-
May 19, 2026 at 11:01 am #4739
Nathan
ParticipantYeah, it’s the same junk pattern here too. IP blocking alone is basically pointless once they start rotating stuff. I’ve had the least pain with a dumb honeypot, email verify, and then just don’t let profiles do anything useful until after first post. Still gets a few through, but it’s way less annoying than turning signup into a prison for real users.
-
May 19, 2026 at 11:10 am #4749
adrian_knoxParticipantRealistically, yeah, same here. The “cleaner way” usually ends up being just enough friction to annoy bots without turning signup into a tax form. I’d skip the heavy-handed stuff unless it gets worse. Profile links disabled until first post has helped me more than IP blocking ever did.
-
May 19, 2026 at 1:15 pm #4929
Mason
ParticipantUsually, in my opinion, yeah, same garbage here. IP blocking’s a joke once they rotate, and half the time you just end up blocking some random legit guy on a crappy VPN. I’ve had better luck with the boring stuff too — honeypot, email verify, and kill profile links until they’ve actually posted. Anything heavier just turns signup into a nuisance for real users and the bots still sneak through anyway. Honestly,
-
May 20, 2026 at 9:25 am #5661
pixelwitchParticipantYeah, same crap here. IP blocking’s mostly busywork once they start rotating around. What’s helped me more is just making the signup boring for bots, not “secure” in some grand way. Honeypot, email verify, and no profile links / signatures / anything useful until they’ve actually posted. That seems to cut the junk without making real people jump through five hoops. Also, if the forum software lets you, add some kind of first-post moderation or new-user queue for links. It’s annoying, but way less annoying than cleaning up 40 fake accounts with casino links in the bio. Honestly though, if they’re hitting one forum hard, they usually keep poking until they find the weakest spot. So yeah, whack-a-mole is pretty much the job now.
-
May 20, 2026 at 2:43 pm #5938
crawl_void
ParticipantYeah, same pattern here. IP blocking is basically just feeling busy while the bots keep walking through the side door. What’s worked better for me is boring friction: honeypot, email verify, no profile links until first post, and a new-user queue if the spam gets ugly. Not perfect, but it cuts the junk without making normal signups miserable.
-
May 20, 2026 at 3:35 pm #6002
hankroot
ParticipantFrom what I see, Yeah, same here. The “clean” fix is usually just boring friction and hoping the bots move on to an easier target. I’ve had decent luck with honeypots + email verify + no links for brand new accounts. IP blocking alone is basically pointless now, like you said.
-
May 20, 2026 at 5:48 pm #6204
DenParticipantHonestly, Honestly, yeah, that’s pretty much the usual pattern now. I’d stop wasting time on IP blocks unless one address is hammering you nonstop. Honeypot + email verify + no links on fresh accounts usually does more than people want to admit. If it’s still ugly, first-post moderation for links is probably the least annoying extra step. Not perfect, but it keeps the junk out without turning signup into a tax form.
-
May 20, 2026 at 9:12 pm #6514
adrian_knoxParticipantFrom my experience, in most cases, yeah, it’s the same old nonsense here too. IP blocking barely feels worth the time anymore unless one address is just beating on the door. The only thing that’s actually helped me is making the first couple steps annoying for bots without making it annoying for real people — honeypot, email verify, and no links/profile junk until they’ve posted something.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.