- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 3 hours, 37 minutes ago by
mercer.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
mercer
ParticipantI’ve been testing a few different internal linking workflows over the last couple of months on a couple of niche sites, and I’m starting to think the results are more nuanced than most people make it sound.
The basic setup was:
– Existing content site with ~180 indexed pages
– Decent topical cluster structure already in place
– Manual internal links added during publishing, but not systematically revisited
– I tested an AI-assisted workflow to suggest contextual links between older and newer postsWhat I found:
1. **The AI was decent at finding semantically related pages**
It did a better job than I expected at spotting pages that were topically relevant, especially when the article titles were vague but the content was strong. That said, it still missed some obvious commercial pages and occasionally suggested links that were technically related but not actually useful to the reader.2. **The biggest improvement came from fixing orphaned and underlinked pages**
This is probably not surprising, but the pages that got the most benefit were the ones that had good content but very weak internal support. Once they were linked from a few relevant articles, impressions started to move first, then clicks followed later.3. **Exact-match anchor text was not the magic lever**
I tested a fairly conservative approach and a more aggressive one. In my experience, anchor variety and placement mattered more than stuffing in keyword-rich anchors. If the link felt forced, it didn’t seem worth keeping even if it was “optimized.”4. **Automation helped most with scale, not with strategy**
The AI workflow saved time, but it didn’t replace editorial judgment. I still had to manually review suggested links, especially for money pages and posts targeting broader terms. I don’t trust a tool to decide the final linking map on its own.5. **Results were slower than people expect**
A lot of forum posts make it sound like internal linking changes rankings in a few days. In my case, the effects were more gradual. I’d call it more of a compounding improvement than a quick win.I’m curious how others are handling this now.
– Are you using AI to suggest internal links, or still doing it manually?
– Do you have a process for prioritizing which pages get more internal support?
– Have you seen better results from contextual links, sidebar links, hub pages, or something else?
– For
-
-
AuthorPosts