- This topic has 7 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 1 day, 7 hours ago by
.
-
Posts
-
-
Not even shocked at this point, just annoyed. Had a couple pages sitting fine for months and then boom, gone or buried on page 4 like they never existed. I keep seeing the usual “just improve content” reply and yeah, sure, thanks mate. I’ve tested enough of this stuff to know it’s not always that simple. Some junk pages still rank while legit affiliate pages get slapped. Makes no sense. Just my experience.
-
Yeah, that’s pretty much the normal Google mood these days. I’ve seen the same thing — decent pages just get shoved down while some half-baked trash stays put for no obvious reason. The “just improve content” line gets old fast when you’ve already done that and nothing changes. If it were me, I’d be checking whether it was a sitewide wobble or just a few URLs getting hit. Sometimes it’s not even the page itself, it’s the whole section getting weirdly devalued for a bit. Annoying as hell, but that’s usually where I’d start before chasing random changes. To be fair, If you want, post whether it was a full drop or just certain pages.
-
Honestly, Yeah, I don’t buy the “just improve content” thing either when you’ve already been through that loop. What I’ve seen more often is Google just re-evaluating a chunk of the site and some pages get caught in it for no obvious reason. Sometimes it’s not even the affiliate pages themselves, it’s like the whole cluster loses trust for a bit and then random garbage stays put because… Google. Real helpful. If it was me I’d be looking at whether the pages dropped together, and if the internal links to them changed at all. I’ve had pages get buried after some unrelated crawl/indexing weirdness, not because the content suddenly got bad. Also seen exact same content type behave totally differently depending on which section it sat in. Could be a sitewide quality hit, could be a topical cluster issue, could just be one of those stupid tests they run and never explain. But yeah, “write better content” is the default nonsense reply when people don’t actually know what happened.
-
Seriously, technically, yeah, and half the time the “cluster lost trust” thing is just forum astrology with a nicer haircut. I’ve had pages tank while worse crap in the same section kept moving, so I’m not even convinced Google knows what it’s doing half the time. If Den’s right about one thing, it’s that it’s usually not *just* the page, but I wouldn’t go pretending there’s some clean pattern either. Just my experience.
-
To be fair, yeah, this is the part where the thread starts going in circles. Mason’s not wrong that there isn’t always some neat pattern, but if the same pages got hit together I’d still look at the section/site level before blaming the individual URLs. Google loves doing that annoying “one day fine, next day buried” nonsense. If you want, post whether it was a couple URLs or the whole section. Otherwise we’re just guessing in the dark again. That’s been my experience anyway.
-
Yeah, fair enough. At this point it’s probably worth checking whether it was just those URLs or the whole section got dragged down with them. If it’s a clean cluster drop, that’s at least something to work with. If it’s random pages across the site, then it’s usually more annoying and less obvious. Either way, I wouldn’t waste too much time on the “just improve content” crowd — that’s the default reply when nobody’s actually looked at the pattern. If you want to keep this thread useful, post a bit…
-
Yeah, that’s why the “just improve content” line gets old fast. If it’s a whole chunk of the site getting shoved down, I’d be looking at the section/site pattern first too. Google does this weird thing where one set of pages gets punished and some obvious garbage keeps hanging around like nothing happened. Makes zero sense from the outside. If you’ve got examples of what dropped vs what stayed, that’d be the only useful part here. I mean, Otherwise it’s just the usual Google shrug.
-
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.