Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Yeah, same kind of garbage here. One client site did the little “yay you’re back” thing for about 36 hours and then got shoved right back where it was, which is exactly why I don’t trust these swings at all anymore. At agency level it’s annoying because clients see the spike and immediately start asking if “the SEO is working now,” then a couple days later it’s flat again and suddenly we’re back to explaining that Google’s being weird. Fun stuff. I’m with you on the advice too — half the takes floating around this week are just people dressing up guesses as analysis. If it’s still bouncing in another week or two, fine, then maybe there’s something real. Right now it mostly feels like noise and people trying to sound smarter than they are. Just my experience.
From what I see, Personally, yeah, that’s been my experience too. The “indexing got better” win usually comes with some dumb re-shuffle right after, like Google’s patting itself on the back while traffic eats shit. I’d be looking at what actually dropped first, not the crawl stuff. Usually there’s a pattern there even if Search Console tries to make it look random.
Yeah, 2 days is basically noise unless it keeps doing it. I’ve seen people rip pages apart over a weekend wobble and then spend a month undoing their own “fixes.” Google loves to mess with people, but half the time the panic does more damage than the drop.
From what I see, Yeah, same here. One site did the little fake lift-and-drop thing and the other one’s just dead flat like Google forgot it exists. Honestly I don’t even bother with half the “insights” people post during this stuff anymore. Too much guessing, not enough actual checking. From what I see,
Yeah, I’ve seen it too. One client site is crawling fine and another one with basically the same setup is acting like new URLs don’t exist for 3-4 days, which is always a fun little Google mystery. At this point I’m not ripping the whole thing apart unless crawl stats or logs actually show something weird. If the pages are discoverable and not blocked, half the time it’s just Google dragging its feet again. That said, I’d still check the boring stuff first — internal links, sitemap freshness, lastmod nonsense, and whether the new pages are getting any real crawl paths. Sometimes it’s not “broken,” it’s just buried. But yeah, if everything else looks normal, I’m not buying the “your site is cursed” take either.
Technically, in most cases, yeah, I’m seeing it on a couple properties too. One site’s crawling like normal, another’s basically pretending fresh URLs don’t exist for days. At this point I’m not even assuming it’s a clean site issue unless there’s something obvious in crawl stats or templates. Google’s been weird enough lately that “same setup, different outcome” doesn’t surprise me much anymore. From what I see,
Usually, yeah, we’re seeing it too. Not every page, but enough to make it annoying. The worst part is it’s not even always the best answer getting surfaced, it’s just the fastest one. Google’s been shoving those summaries into places where the click used to be, and if your page isn’t the obvious “must click” result, it gets skipped. We’ve had a few client pages hold rankings but still lose traffic, which is a fun little joke. So no, you’re most likely not just having a bad run. It’s been creeping for a while and some verticals are getting hit harder than others. I wouldn’t panic on one week of data, but if you’re seeing a pattern across a bunch of pages, that’s real. That’s been my experience anyway.
Technically, yeah, I’ve seen that cliff-drop thing too. Usually it’s not some nice clean “the site aged out” decline, it’s more like one re-crawl and suddenly Google acts like the whole thing never existed. If it’s happening across a couple expireds, I’d be looking at shared stuff before blaming the content. Same host, same redirect style, same CMS, same link pattern, whatever. Google’s been weirdly good at sniffing out that recycled expired-domain setup lately, or maybe they just got more aggressive with whatever bucket they’re tossing these into. The crawl rate part is the bit that makes me side-eye it. Once they stop getting decent crawl attention, it’s usually already heading downhill. I’ve had a few that looked fine for a month or two, then the crawl just dried up and rankings followed right after. No drama, just dead. Could still be baggage on the domains, sure. A lot of sellers talk a big game and the history’s uglier than they let on. But if it was truly overnight, I wouldn’t be shocked if it was some reprocess/filter thing more than “your pages got worse.” Google loves doing that nonsense.
Yeah, seeing it here too. Same junk signups, same lazy link dumps, nothing clever about it. If it’s coming back that fast after nuking accounts, I’d be looking at whatever door they’re using, not the accounts themselves. Been through this before and the “cleanup” part is basically pointless if the registration flow’s still soft. Mason’s probably right on that one, annoying as that is.
Yeah, it’s the same crap here. At this point CAPTCHA just feels like theater. I’ve had better luck with boring stuff too — first post approval, no links anywhere for fresh accounts, and killing signatures until they’ve been around a bit. Not sexy, but it cuts the junk down fast enough that it’s not eating my day. Still annoying though. These waves come in like they found one weak setting and just keep hammering it until you patch it.
Realistically, yeah, it’s not just you. I’ve got a couple older sites doing the same dumb dance — crawl logs look fine, then the page just sits there forever like Google forgot it exists. The part that gets me is the random junk getting in fast. That’s the bit that makes the whole “quality” story feel like nonsense, honestly. I don’t buy the clean explanation for it anymore. There’s clearly some weirdness in how they’re deciding what gets attention, and it doesn’t seem very consistent site to site. I’ve had a few pages eventually pop in after a week or two, but some just never do unless something else changes on the site. So yeah, “hit or miss” is about right. Pretty annoying when you’re trying to move stuff on a client site and you’re stuck…
Honestly, In my opinion, yeah, seeing the same. A couple sites here just sat in limbo for ages and then randomly moved, no real pattern I could pin down. At this point I’m not assuming it’s some sneaky site issue unless it’s only happening on…
Realistically, yeah, I’d lean plugin too, at least as the trigger. Had a caching/minify update do almost exactly this on a client site last year — Chrome looked busted, GSC started throwing crawl junk, and traffic fell off a cliff for a couple days. Rolled it back and it didn’t magically fix everything, but enough came back that it was pretty obvious something in the output got messed up. I’d check: – rendered HTML vs source – whether it’s serving stale cached junk – any JS/CSS being deferred or combined wrong – canonicals / noindex / robots weirdness after the update Google being Google can muddy it, sure, but “right after plugin update” is usually not a coincidence. pixelwitch is kinda right for once, annoyingly. Personally,
From what I’ve seen, yeah, I’m with crawl_void on this one. A 2-day wobble isn’t me tearing a site apart for no reason. Usually it’s just Google doing its usual nonsense and then pretending it was “intentional.” Personally,
Personally, Yeah, it’s real. Not “maybe in some niches” real — just flat out real. We’ve got a few pages that didn’t move much position-wise, but the clicks fell off a cliff once those AI boxes started showing up. And it’s always the same annoying pattern: impressions hold up, rankings look “stable,” then the CTR gets wrecked and everyone acts surprised. The part that bugs me is clients don’t care about the nuance. They see “still ranking” and assume nothing changed, meanwhile the SERP’s basically answering the query before they ever hit the site. So yeah, visibility is kind of a joke metric now on a lot of terms. I don’t think it’s just your niche either. Some queries are getting gutted harder…