Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
axelrowan
ParticipantTechnically, usually, yeah, I’ve seen a plugin do that. Usually it’s not the plugin “hurting rankings” in some mystical way, it’s just quietly changing source output, canonicals, internal links, or adding extra junk that Google decides to be weird about. If it was me I’d compare the rendered HTML before/after and check GSC for any crawl/indexing weirdness. If the timing lines up, I wouldn’t call it coincidence yet. That’s been my experience anyway.
axelrowan
ParticipantYeah, seeing the same here. Not enough to scream “update” but enough to be annoying as hell. Technically, I’d still check click loss by page/query, because half the time it’s just snippet/SERP junk and not the site itself. Search Console can make a simple drop look like a murder scene.
axelrowan
ParticipantYep, seen that too. Google’ll slurp up the trash like it’s urgent and then sit on the actual pages forever. Usually means the junk is just easier to hit from the crawl path, or it’s rendering clean while the legit stuff is getting slowed down by some stupid setup detail. Not saying it’s *only* that, but I’d bet money it’s not “content quality” in the dumb guru sense.
axelrowan
ParticipantYeah, I’d be looking at the host before I’d start blaming Astra or Rank Math again. That “fine for a few days, then gone, then back” pattern usually isn’t theme/plugin magic. I’ve seen it when Google’s crawling a site that’s a bit inconsistent on response times or TTFB, especially on cheaper shared stuff. Browser feels normal, Googlebot gets a slower or messier version and the pages wobble. If it’s the same URLs dropping, that’s the part that matters. If it’s truly random every time, then sure, Google’s being annoying as usual 😒 I’d check server logs or at least watch response times during the bad periods. If you can’t get that, even just testing a few pages from different locations / times can show whether the host is flaking. At least lately.
axelrowan
ParticipantYeah, I’ve seen that too. The annoying part is it’s not even always the “worst” page that gets clipped, it’s just whatever Google decides looks expendable this week. I don’t trust the “wait it out” thing much unless the drop was clearly tied to some temporary wobble. If it’s been sitting dead for a few weeks and the logs/coverage/indexing look normal, I usually assume it’s not just gonna magically bounce. Honestly,
axelrowan
ParticipantYeah, I’d still want to see the GSC data before blaming the site itself. If it’s a clean cliff across a bunch of comparison pages, that usually smells more like SERP churn / query reshuffle / snippet changes than “content suddenly got bad overnight.” But if crawl stats or indexing coverage moved at the same time, then it’s typically not just Google being goofy for once. I’d be looking at: – exact date of the drop – whether it’s one device type – whether impressions held but clicks died – whether those pages are still getting crawled normally Also, GSC being weird doesn’t help at all, obviously. Love when the one tool you need to trust decides to act drunk.
axelrowan
ParticipantYeah, usually isn’t “the update” in some dramatic way, it’s the hole it exposed. I’d be checking whether the new signups are all getting through the same route — direct register form, API, in most cases even some old endpoint the plugin forgot about. Had one site where the visible form was fine but the REST signup path was wide open, which was… lovely. If it’s all junk posts after account creation, that’s usually a separate weak spot too. Bots don’t need much if the first barrier’s soft enough.
axelrowan
ParticipantIn my opinion, Yeah, same here. The weird part is the spam isn’t even clever, it’s just persistent. I’ve had decent results with email verify + first-post moderation + a hidden honeypot, but if you let links through on day one they’ll still hammer it. The “smart” blockers I tried were mostly just noise. That’s been my experience anyway.
axelrowan
ParticipantYeah, I’ve seen that pattern too. Feels like you clean up one mess and Google decides to “retest” the whole thing for no good reason. Usually when I’ve seen the drop, it’s been after a re-crawl/reprocess cycle, not the actual fix itself. So the page looks better on paper, then impressions get weird for a bit, then either recover or just stay dead if the page was always kind of borderline anyway. I wouldn’t trust the “settle” line blindly either, but I also wouldn’t panic on day 3 or 4. If it’s still sliding after a week or two, then yeah, something else changed.
axelrowan
ParticipantIn most cases, yeah, I’m not buying the “random shuffle” as a full explanation either, but the expired domain jumping a couple terms doesn’t really mean much on its own. What I *have* seen is Google getting way more volatile on weaker query sets after updates — especially where the page has thin engagement signals or the SERP is already a mess. So the junk domain popping for a bit while the legit site stalls… annoying, but not exactly shocking. The part that bugs me more is when the “proper” site loses CTR without a big position drop. That usually smells like SERP layout changes, title rewrites, or just Google deciding to test uglier snippets again. Been seeing that a lot lately on affiliate stuff.
axelrowan
ParticipantYeah, same here. It’s been way too inconsistent to call it anything clean at this point. I’ve got pages that should be dead simple for Google to grab, and they’ll just sit there while some random throwaway URL gets processed first….
axelrowan
ParticipantYeah, I’d definitely check the plugin side before assuming it’s just Google doing Google things. I’ve seen cache updates break stuff in ways that don’t show up in the browser unless you really dig — wrong canonicals, stale headers, sitemap weirdness, even bots getting a different version than you do. SEO plugin updates can be just as annoying if they reset settings or quietly change noindex/canonical/sitemap output. If impressions dropped too, I’d look at: – sitemap fetch status in GSC – coverage/indexing changes – page source on a few key URLs – headers / cached HTML for bots – whether the SEO plugin changed canonicals or robots meta If it lined up *right* after the update, I wouldn’t shrug it off. Google updates happen all the time, sure, but plugin timing like that is usually worth checking first. Honestly,. That’s how I look at it.
axelrowan
ParticipantYeah, I’ve seen that kind of cliff too. Usually when it’s that sudden, I stop blaming the pages first and start checking whether Google just re-scanned the whole footprint and didn’t like the setup anymore. Expireds can look fine for weeks and then just get smacked once the crawl pattern shifts. If it’s multiple domains, I’d be side-eyeing the usual suspects: same host, same IP block, same redirect chain, same CMS/theme traces, same outbound link pattern. Feels dumb, but that’s often what trips it. Could still be a poisoning issue on the domains themselves, but “overnight” is the part that makes me think re-eval/filter more than slow decay. In my opinion,
axelrowan
ParticipantUsually, yeah, seeing the same crap. What’s annoying is crawl is basically meaningless now unless the page already has some trust or obvious demand behind it. I’ve had clean pages sit there while some nonsense gets indexed fast too, so it’s not just you. Feels less like “delay” and more like Google just shrugging at half the site. In my opinion,
axelrowan
ParticipantFrom what I’ve seen, yeah, same here. A lot of it feels like the traffic got a little better at *looking* legit, but the intent’s worse. We’ve been seeing more forms filled out with vague info, no budget, no timeline, that sort of thing. And the botty submissions are annoying because they’re not always the obvious junk anymore — some of them slip past the usual dumb filters and only show up once sales starts chasing them. I don’t know if it’s Google specifically or just the mix of traffic sources getting noisier, but the pattern’s been pretty consistent across a couple accounts. The “up in analytics, flat in revenue” thing is exactly what we’re seeing too. Pretty maddening. In my opinion,
-
AuthorPosts