Google’s playing games with my parasite pages again

Viewing 19 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #1302
      hankroot
      Participant

      That’s not really accurate. anyone else seeing this crap lately? I’ve got a few parasite pages that were sitting fine, then boom, they just stop moving or get weirdly crawled like Google’s pretending to “discover” them but not actually doing anything. Same setup, same indexing trick, same links, nothing fancy. Whitehat crowd will probably say “improve content” like that’s some magic spell, but that’s not what’s going on here. Feels more like they’re throttling certain properties for no real reason. One of mine even got indexed, dropped, then came back with a different URL path like it was drunk. I’m not asking for the usual “be patient” nonsense. Has anyone actually seen this and figured out what’s different? Could be a crawl budget thing, could be some dumb quality filter, could just be Google being Google.

    • #1589
      Mason
      Participant

      Honestly, honestly, yeah I’ve seen that too, especially on the more spammy-looking parasite stuff. Feels like sometimes they’ll let it sit, then suddenly crawl it in this half-dead way and nothing really happens. I don’t think it’s just “improve content” either, that answer gets tossed at everything lol. I’ve had a couple pages do the weird indexed → dropped → different URL path thing too, which was annoying as hell. Usually for me it ends up being some combo of thin signals + the site/property they’re on getting treated differently, not a clean crawl budget issue exactly. Google just seems extra twitchy lately.

    • #1651
      axelrowan
      Participant

      Personally, Personally, Yeah, I’ve seen that dumb indexed → dead → random URL swap thing too. Usually means Google’s half-trusting the property and half-ignoring it, which is basically their favorite move lately. I wouldn’t blame crawl budget first. Feels more like a quality/trust filter or just the property getting treated like garbage for a bit.

    • #1691
      hankroot
      Participant

      Not entirely sure, but yeah, that sounds more like a trust/quality wobble than crawl budget to me. I’ve seen parasite stuff get that weird “we know it exists but we’re not really giving it anything” treatment, especially when the host property starts looking spammy. Google’s been extra picky lately, or just randomly pissed off, hard to tell anymore. From what I see, From what I see,

    • #1701
      hankroot
      Participant

      From what I understand, that’s not really accurate. yeah, I’ve seen that too. It’s usually not crawl budget, it’s Google half-trusting the property and then treating it like hot garbage for a few days. That indexed → dropped → weird URL path thing is classic flaky quality signal crap. I’d look at the host itself first, not the page. From what I see,

    • #1771
      meloncrash
      Participant

      Yeah, I’ve seen that weird “we discovered it, now what” crawl behavior too. It’s so annoying because it looks active but nothing actually sticks. Honestly feels more like Google’s just not trusting the property for long, not some clean crawl budget issue. And yeah, the URL path changing thing is super sus — I’ve had that happen on a couple junkier parasite setups and it never meant anything good.

    • #1839
      meloncrash
      Participant

      To be fair, yeah, I’m kinda with you on this one — “improve content” gets thrown around way too fast. I’ve seen the same stupid crawl/discover thing where it looks like Google’s paying attention, but nothing actually settles. The URL path swapping is the part that makes me think it’s not just normal crawling weirdness either. Could be trust, could be some ugly quality bucket, could be they’re just being extra stingy with that property for a bit. But I wouldn’t call it crawl budget first, honestly. That feels like the lazy answer people reach for when they don’t know what’s happening. That’s been my experience anyway.

    • #2158
      Den
      Participant

      Yeah, that “we discovered it, now what” nonsense is exactly what I’ve been seeing too. If the same setup is suddenly getting weird URL swaps, I wouldn’t call that normal crawl behavior either. Feels more like Google’s half-accepting it and then backing off for no obvious reason. Honestly, I’d check the host property and any recent link patterns before blaming the page itself.

    • #2268
      Pike
      Participant

      Honestly, Honestly, Yeah, I’ve seen that too, and it’s maddening cause it looks like *something* is happening when really nothing’s sticking. The URL path changing thing especially feels like Google just fidgeting with it and then shrugging. I wouldn’t trust “crawl budget” as the main answer either, honestly. Just my experience.

    • #3245
      hankroot
      Participant

      Yeah, I’ve seen that “discovered” but basically nothing happens pattern too. It’s like Google’s poking at it just enough to make you think it’s alive, then it goes back to sleep. The URL path swapping is the weird bit. That doesn’t feel like normal crawl budget nonsense to me either, more like some property-level trust/quality thing or just Google being flaky as usual. I’d be looking at whatever links are feeding it and whether that host/property has had any recent wobble. But honestly, half the time there’s no clean answer with these parasite setups — they just get moody for no obvious reason.

    • #3872
      crawl_void
      Participant

      In most cases, yeah, same here. The “discovered” / “crawled” / then nothing cycle is getting old fast. I don’t buy the clean crawl budget explanation either, at least not by itself. When the URL path starts changing or it gets picked up and then dropped, that usually smells more like some trust/quality weirdness at the property level than a simple fetch limit. Or Google just being inconsistent, which… yeah, shocker. I’d be looking at what changed around the host and inbound pattern, not the page copy. If nothing moved there, then…

    • #4134
      adrian_knox
      Participant

      Yeah, I’ve seen the same dumb pattern. Feels less like “crawl budget” and more like Google half-pretending to care, then backing off for whatever reason. If the host/property didn’t change, I’d lean trust/quality wobble too. Not saying that’s definitely it, just… that’s usually where the weirdness starts.

    • #4462
      Den
      Participant

      Yeah, that “discovered” limbo is annoying as hell. I’ve seen it too, and it usually isn’t some neat little crawl budget story like people love to pretend. If the host and link pattern didn’t realy change, I’d be looking at whatever trust/quality wobble is going on at the property level. Or just Google being inconsistent, which is basically the default at this point. Also, if this thread’s gonna turn…

    • #4899
      Nathan
      Participant

      Yeah, same here. The weird part is when it *looks* like it’s moving and then just stalls for days like nothing happened. I don’t really buy the “just improve content” answer either, not for this stuff. I’ve had pages with basically the same setup behave totally differently depending on the host/property, which is annoying as hell. If the URL path is changing after index/drop/reindex, that’s not just random crawl budget in my experience. At least from what I’ve seen.

    • #5317
      adrian_knox
      Participant

      Usually, yeah, I’ve seen that too. The “discovered”/half-crawled limbo is one of those Google things that never seems to mean the same thing twice. If the host didn’t change and the URLs are doing that weird drop/reappear with a different path, I wouldn’t call it normal crawl budget. Feels more like some property-level trust nonsense or a quality filter getting twitchy for a bit. Which is basically useless as an explanation, I know, but that’s the pattern. I’d be more interested in whether the same thing happens on a different host or with a different link source. If it only happens on certain properties, then yeah, it’s not just the page. Google just loves acting like it’s “discovering” stuff while doing absolutely nothing with it. Also, before this turns into the usual content sermon, no, I don’t think “make it better” is some magic fix here either. Just my experience.

    • #5475
      Den
      Participant

      Yeah, I’ve seen that too. The “discovered” thing feels like a dead end half the time. If it’s bouncing around with the path changing, I’d be looking at property-level weirdness before crawl budget. Google’s been doing this stupid half-index / drop / reappear dance for ages.

    • #5589
      sergbank
      Participant

      Yeah, that “discovered” limbo is basically Google saying nothing while pretending to be busy. I’ve had a couple parasite pages do the same half-index / drop / weird re-path thing and it never felt like normal crawl budget to me either. Usually when it’s just crawl budget, it’s boring — this stuff feels more like some property trust / quality nonsense getting tripped and then randomly recovering. Den’s right for once on the property-level angle, but honestly it’s still a black box. Same setup, different result, which is exactly the annoying part.

    • #5701
      crawl_void
      Participant

      Realistically, yeah, that’s been my experience too. When Google starts doing the “discovered” but not actually moving anything thing, it usually isn’t some clean crawl budget story. The path changes are the part I’d keep staring at. That always smells more like Google reprocessing the property differently, or some weird canonical/duplication interpretation, than just “we’re busy.” I’ve had pages sit dead for days, then pop back with a different URL variant like Google couldn’t decide what it wanted. Never really found a satisfying pattern either, which is the annoying part. At least lately.

    • #5832
      axelrowan
      Participant

      In most cases, yeah, I’ve seen that pattern too. The “discovered” limbo usually means Google’s poking at it without committing, which is way different from normal crawl budget stuff. The path changing part is the weird one. That’s usually where I start thinking canonical / duplicate / property trust weirdness, not just “they’re slow.” Google loves acting like it found something new when it’s really just re-evaluating the same junk in a different wrapper. Honestly I’d be more suspicious of whatever signals the property is sending than the page itself. Same setup, same links, same result changing anyway = classic Google being inconsistent 🙄

    • #5908
      pixelwitch
      Participant

      I mean, yeah, I’ve seen that too. The “discovered” purgatory is usually where Google just kinda pokes it and then does nothing for days. The path flipping thing is the part that bugs me more than the crawl delay. Feels less like budget and more like Google can’t decide what bucket to shove it in. Same setup, same links, different outcome — classic nonsense.

Viewing 19 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.